Dan Pitt » Unified communication

ONF launches; come see at Interop http://goo.gl/tPZ8X #Interop (via@opennetfound)

Dan Pitt — Sun, 08 May 2011 16:18:22 +0000

After some months getting organized under the covers, the Open Networking Foundation launched officially on March 22, 2011 with six board members and 17 other members. Since then another nine companies have joined. A complete list of current members can be seen at www.OpenNetworkingFoundation.org. [Full disclosure: I am dedicated fulltime to ONF as executive director.] I have seen no more exciting a prospect for the future of networking than Software-Defined Networking, which ONF exists to promote. The first specification to be standardized by ONF will be OpenFlow, for which two preliminary draft specifications have already been issued; you can download them at www.OpenFlow.org.

A great opportunity to learn about ONF and see OpenFlow in action will be at Interop this coming week May 10-12, 2011, in Las Vegas. The entire InteropNet Lab booth is devoted to OpenFlow (with at least 15 exhibiting companies), a panel on the Real Next Generation Network will be held Wednesday May 11 from 3:15-4:15 in Breakers L (featuring the inventor of OpenFlow), and ONF itself will conduct an information session on Wednesday May 11 from 11:00-11:45 in Reef C (all at the Mandalay Bay Hotel and Conference Center). Come see me. There will be food!

A new office phone: a big step in the right direction

Dan Pitt — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:44:40 +0000

I got to see a demo of the new enterprise desktop phone from Cloud Telecomputers, called the Glass Platform, and it’s a huge step forward from the tired, pedestrian sorrows I saw at VoiceCon. First of all, it’s almost entirely touchscreen (about 8 inches), with two or perhaps three real (but tiny) buttons at the bottom. All dialing (when you actually have to tap a keypad) is on the touchscreen, as are all other telephony functions. The success of this product, which is still in final development, depends on the appropriateness and ease-of-use of these functions, which is where the primary great aspect of this instrument comes in: Its operation system is Android. So all the great features, functions, and applications will be written by ISVs on the open API that Cloud Telecomputing is releasing. (This is pretty much the regular Android API but for the larger screen.)

What will this buy you? Easy language translation and customization, for starters. Deep and creative integration into workflow software, for another. This latter is what I’m hoping for. Let’s connect these telephony-based communication possibilities with the Enterprise 2.0 stuff (which I wrote about in an earlier blog entry). Let’s make the Glass Platform screen a window in or an extension of the PC screen. Or the Smart Phone screen. Let’s link to remote or administrative operation. Already this pretty package works for both on-site (PBX) and hosted (central office) solutions.

Will desk phones go away altogether? It’s hard to say; perhaps some IT administrators wish they would. But if they’re around for long I guarantee this is what they will look like. (And increasingly as apps for existing tablet computers like the iPad or Xoom.)

I used to like telephony

Dan Pitt — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:12:29 +0000

The old days
I started disassembling phones as a boy, which was a bit risky since only AT&T owned the instrument and you could not go to the store and buy a replacement if you broke it. There was no such thing as spare phones for experimenters. I worked on speech compression in graduate school, and was fascinated by signals, bandwidth, filters, and the like. I almost began my professional career designing digital central-office switches and PBXs at Northern Telecom in Creedmoor, North Carolina, but got a better offer from IBM in Durham and instead worked on data networks (especially LANs). For a while there was some interest in carrying voice on early LANs, like IBM’s token ring, but that went nowhere commercially. Then we tried to harmonize datacom and telecom technologies with asynchronous transfer mode. Only the standards weenies made out well on that one. Finally, with the advent of switched ethernet, it became possible to carry voice calls on ethernet networks. But carrying the voice was only the tip of the iceberg. The control plane and billing presented much greater challenges. So we’ve seen quite an evolution of IP-based telephony systems for toll bypass on the Internet, enterprise systems, and just about everywhere else. And lately the rage is with SIP (the session initiation protocol). I have no gripe with the SIPification of everything – indeed it’s probably a necessary step – but voice is still living in a different world from the rest of the Internet revolution, and it’s mostly a yawn. Too bad. I used to think it was cool.

And now?
I was reminded of the chasm when I attended VoiceCon recently. This all-things-VOIP conference shared a trade-show floor (at Moscone in San Francisco) with Enterprise 2.0, and thank heavens it did. All the major VoiceCon vendors showed their Unified Communications solutions, which appeared to me to merely glom together things we have been using for years, and by “we” I mean all of us with gray hair and traditional work practices. Worse, a number of the smaller vendors were showing new desk telephones, which basically have changed hardly at all in 20 years. They still have a handset, pushbuttons, and a display (which my phone in Switzerland had in 1990). This is new? These things can’t get any more archaic.

The Enterprise 2.0 vendors, on the other hand, showed exciting, if not fully mature, products for communication, collaboration, and documentation, which is how a lot more work gets done in organizations these days. Their wiki and blogging tools were very cool. But they were poorly connected to the voice mechanisms. When are these two communities really going to connect? I think I can help here.

My ears are slow

Dan Pitt — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:03:32 +0000

The Wall Street Journal recently did a piece on the end of the email era.

The Journal maintains that email is too limiting and ineffective compared to the new media, especially the social media. I’ll get into that more in another post (especially regarding Twitter, IM, and text messaging for short, immediate communications) but right now I want to concentrate on the notion that longlasting interactions will be by voice or video.

Take a look at the WSJ article, the section entitled “Into the River”. I read this in 46 seconds. Then I went back and spoke it, as if I were leaving voicemail for someone. 112 seconds. I can understand how a video can convey images you cannot otherwise describe adequately, but the circumstances under which a voicemail is more efficient than written delivery of the message are limited indeed.